Get Trade Alerts

Signup for super-trades.com Free Email List!

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz
To subscribe to the Super Stocks Blog by RSS feeder click on :

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)


Friday, March 27, 2009

VIFL - A Stock To Watch in 2009

I bought VIFL this week on my alert at $1.35-$1.40 See Blog Post - Here is my reasoning:

VIFL - Food Technology Service, Inc.- 2.8m Shares outstanding and 2m Float per Bloomberg

Food Technology Service, Inc. engages in the ownership and operation of irradiation facility located in Mulberry, Florida. Its irradiation facility uses gamma radiation produced by Cobalt 60 to extend the shelf life of and/or disinfect fruits, vegetables, and meat products; and for the sterilization of medical, surgical, pharmaceutical, and packaging materials. The company provides contract sterilization services to the medical device, food, and consumer goods industries. In addition, it irradiates packaging, cosmetic ingredients, horticultural items, and consumer goods. The company was founded in 1985 and is based in Mulberry, Florida.

Company Website

VIFL is a small ($2.4m revenue run rate) yet profitable company ($0.07 EPS for Q3). Read More Here

1) The Company well positioned to profit on food and medical device irradiation.

Food Technology Service, Inc. CEO Dr. Richard Hunter said, “I am pleased with our growth in revenue and income during this year. Customer demand for medical sterilization continues to grow and there is increasing interest in food irradiation. The Company remains well-positioned to take advantage of that interest as food producers recognize the food-safety benefits of irradiation.” Read More here

Management attributes increased revenue to a growing customer base that requires irradiation of products on a regular basis. The majority of revenue growth is occurring in medical sterilization but strong interest has developed in food irradiation due to recent food recalls and illness outbreaks. Read More Here

While the medical device irradiation business appears to be strong and growing, the food irradiation business could be poised to take off. The Obama administration is focused on food safety and the irradiation debate is heating up. Read More Here

JOURNAL OF AMA MAR 5 2009 Coming to Grips with Foodborne Infection — Peanut Butter, Peppers, and Nationwide Salmonella Outbreaks
Dennis G. Maki, M.D.

LAST PARAGRAPH OF EDITORIAL:
Finally, we already have the capacity to improve food safety by adopting a technology that can protect against safety breakdowns during production, preparation, or cooking: routine irradiation of the final commercial product in the case of poultry and hamburger, processed foods containing eggs or milk, and selected leafy and other vegetables eaten raw could greatly reduce the incidence of bacterial foodborne disease. Research has shown that irradiation kills pathogens or markedly reduces pathogen counts without impairing the nutritional value of food or making it toxic, carcinogenic, or radioactive.5 Food irradiation has been endorsed by the World Health Organization, the CDC, the FDA, the USDA, the American Medical Association, and the European Commission's Scientific Committee on Food and is already used in many other countries. In the United States, irradiation of fresh meat has been allowed since 1997; last August, the FDA approved the irradiation of iceberg lettuce and spinach. The CDC has estimated that irradiation of high-risk foods could prevent up to a million cases of bacterial foodborne disease each year in North America. I believe it is time to launch a major effort to gain public acceptance of irradiation of high-risk foods. It is time to stop reliving history.
Article

2) The FDA recently approved lettuce and spinach for irradiation and some large producers are considering it Read More Here

The industry group wouldn’t name salad suppliers ready to start irradiating. But it expects niche marketing to trickle out first - bags of spinach and lettuce targeted to high-risk populations such as people with weak immune systems “who right now may be afraid to eat uncooked produce,” said GMA’s chief science officer Robert Brackett.

“It’s one big step forward in improving the safety of fresh produce,” he added.

California-based produce giant Dole Food Company confirmed it is considering irradiated lettuce. “We are currently doing extensive testing with irradiation and it looks to be very promising,” said spokesman William Goldfield.

3) VIFL is considered a leader in irradiation and one of a handful of facilities that are approved for food irradiation and is considered a leader in the field

"But most U.S. irradiation facilities treat medical products, and only a handful are set up for food."

"You'll see gradual adoption and early adopters … who convince others to try," says Richard Hunter, CEO of Food Technology Service, a 13-employee food-irradiation company in Florida that's considered a food-irradiation leader but which relies on medical devices for 70% of its revenue.

Read More Here

4) VIFL has been expanding capacity and expected growth before the new FDA approval for lettuce and spinach

As previously mentioned, the Company installed additional Cobalt during the second quarter at a cost of approximately $530,000. The Company paid cash for this Cobalt. Management anticipates increased revenue during the remaining quarters of 2008 based on growing demand for irradiation services. Read More Here

Summary : The possibility exists that in the future the FDA will expand this initiative to other vegetables and ready to eat foods. However, keep in mind that food irradiation is an intensely debated subject and widespread rapid adoption is unlikely. Also, some customers may not want to advertise their use of irradiation. Additionally, the challenge with all small caps is whether or not the management is ready to get a facts based story to the street to enhance shareholder value or play the small meek Company that only releases earnings and doesn't keep the street updated on contract wins and other good news.

That being said, with the small share structure of VIFL and the already profitable existing business, it would not take much for this Company to throw off some growth and strong EPS. Food borne illness outbreaks as well as contract announcements could bring strong momentum to low float VIFL. At any rate it is undervalued here in the $1's. Depending on circumstances playing out (contracts, outbreaks), it is my opinion that VIFL could become a strong momentum play in the future that could take it much higher.

Valuation: VIFL alluded that EPS should be good this quarter all the way back in last year's 10-k (see below)

The EPS comparable they are up against is nil - If they can do $0.07-$0.10 EPS this quarter (They did $0.07 EPS last quarter) then they will have a $0.28-$0.40 run rate.

10 PE $2.80-$4.00
15 PE $4.20-$6.00
20 PE $5.60-$8.00

With the potential for big growth or major theme stock if irradiation adoption for food continues or new outbreaks dominate the news. Also they currently have a IBD EPS rating of 95.

I never buy and hold into earnings and never recommend it. But here I did with a small position and would add if earnings confirm my assumptions.

From last years 10-K

Although there is no assurance, management anticipates continued profitability during 2008 with revenues exceeding those in 2007. The majority of revenue increases are anticipated for the third and fourth quarters after the Company installs additional Cobalt to increase capacity. Management does not anticipate any significant increases in actual processing costs or general and administrative expenses during 2008. 10-K

And in the last 10-Q:

Management anticipates increased revenue during the remaining quarter of 2008 based on growing demand for irradiation services. 10-Q

No comments:

DISCLAIMER

super-trades.com is simply a blog that has information on stocks that the author Superman, likes or may trade. The author may, and usually does have positions in some of the stocks discussed on the site or in email alerts and is under no obligation to disclose the size of the position or the time that it was acquired. The author also reserves the right to buy or sell at ANY time before during or after it is mentioned on this site or an email alert, with no notice or warnings. The posts are not at all intended to be recommendations for anyone else to buy, sell, or hold. Investors should not rely on the information given by this site to make investment decisions.


No contributor of the his site is a registered investment advisor or a broker / dealer. We DO NOT recommend whether to buy, sell, or hold securities . Although we believe the information on this site to be accurate, we DO NOT GUARANTEE the accurateness and completeness of statements made regarding stocks discussed on the site or in email alerts.

The performance section provides information to the public on selected stocks profiled by this site. Past performance should not be used as an indicator of future performances. We try the make the past performance section as accurate as possible but DO NOT GUARANTEE that the information is accurate.

This web site and all email alerts sent by this site contain "forward looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, goals, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be "forward looking statements." Forward looking statements are based on expectations, estimates and projections at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. Forward looking statements in this action may be identified through the use of words such as "expects", "will," "anticipates," "estimates," believes," or statements indicating certain actions "may," "could," or "might" occur.

If any part of this disclaimer is not clear, please take the time to consult an attorney or investment specialist. Please take caution in all investment endeavors and good luck to all.

Again, My messages are not investment advice, investment solicitation or the like. Do not take action based on my messages. I do not guarantee or make claims to the accuracy of anything I post. I may buy or sell any securities I mention at anytime, even prior to posting. It is my opinion, that individuals should perform their own due diligence before investing in any stock at anytime and not base decisions on messages posted by other individuals. Individuals should assume 100% responsibility for their own investing. My messages are for my own entertainment only. LOW FLOAT stocks in particular can be volatile and are not for new traders in my opinion. I am not a registered investment advisor in any shape or form, please do not ask me for ANY investment advice.

Welcome to super-trades.com, blog home of Superman. Purpose of this blog is for me to discuss my trades and stock ideas (As well as opinions and rants on stock market related issues). I will mention the date and price I enter. As far as exits, I always try to take half off when I have some profit and if I believe in the stock, let the rest run further. I always also use mental stop limits, at which time I would exit and minimize any losses. I do not like to give price targets unless I can support them by P/E in some way or by comparison to another stock. I just post stock trades and ideas that I believe will go higher (or lower for shorts) and the reason I believe that. Individuals should have their own strategies for managing profits and losses. My stock picks tend to NOT be daytrades at all and many take time to move. I am not an investment advisor and this blog should not be considered or followed as investment advice.